For university academics
Good workhas company.
For the work behind academic work.
PaperGrade
AvailableYour criteria.
Your assessment.
Prepare, calibrate, and review exam answers. Keep the reasoning in view.
Open PaperGradeA score proposal is not a final grade.
Illustrative exam example
Select a criterion to follow the proposal.
- Prepare the exam and rubric
- Calibrate with reference answers
- AI score proposals
- Instructor review and decision
Exam question and student answer
Does this study show that the app works?
Students chose whether to use the app. App users scored higher, but motivation may explain the difference. This shows an association, not proof of causation.
Rubric criterion
Criterion proposal: 2 of 2 points
Recognises self-selection rather than random assignment.
You accept, adjust, or reject this proposal.
Criterion proposal: 1 of 2 points
Names a confounder, but does not explain how to control it.
You accept, adjust, or reject this proposal.
Criterion proposal: 2 of 2 points
Distinguishes an association from a causal claim.
You accept, adjust, or reject this proposal.
Librarian
In developmentResearch that
stays connected.
Start with your work. Connect the sources you add to what you are making.
Sources you added
Shared method
A method you can compare.
A book chapter that uses the same coding method for seminar discussions.
“Have two readers code each discussion independently.”
Supporting evidence
Another source, a similar pattern.
A survey report describing the reading pattern explored in your paper.
“Most surveyed readers revisited earlier sections before citing them.”
Different finding
A difference worth examining.
A journal article reports a different result under time pressure. Compare the conditions before calling it a contradiction.
“Recall was lower under time pressure.”
Another context
Test the idea in another setting.
A department syllabus offers a different context for the same research question.
“Week 1: students begin with a shared reading list.”
Illustrative example
Fictional research map
A connection is useful when you can explain it.
About Librarian
Built around your manuscript, research project, or other work. You add articles, books, reports, and documents; Librarian is being developed to explain their connections to that work. Finding new sources automatically is a future possibility, not part of the current plan. No public application is available yet.
Credit transfer
Research projectLearning
should travel.
Keep institutional rules fixed. Explore course equivalence that adapts to faculty judgment.
Course evidence map
Illustrative course comparison.
Fixed institutional requirements
- Minimum ECTS ratio
- Minimum grade
- Prerequisites
- Course level
Fixed rules. Feedback never changes them.
Source course
Research Methods
Target course
Applied Research
Source evidence
“Develop a research question, hypothesis, and study plan.”
The source syllabus documents the required design work.
Source evidence
“Summarise survey results with statistics and charts.”
Descriptive statistics are documented; significance testing is not.
Evidence gap
No matching unit in this sample syllabus.
More evidence is needed. An undocumented topic is not a recognition decision.
Faculty feedback
“Matching topics alone is not enough here. Students must interpret results, not just calculate them.”
Guidance for later comparisons
For this department, distinguish calculation from interpretation when weighing content differences. Keep this example for later judgments.
The proposal updates judgment guidance, not institutional rules. Check rule preservation before using an update. Recommend accept, reject, or modify; the faculty decides.
A comparison to inspect, not a recognition decision.
About the research
A proposed multi-agent system reads course documents, retrieves candidate courses, and assesses equivalence with evidence. Faculty corrections would refine departmental guidance and examples without retraining the model or relaxing institutional constraints. The paper presents a conceptual design, not measured performance or a public application.
Where minds
meet peers.
A useful second perspective.
Not a substitute for yours.